It has been 3 years since I did my own loan modification for my own house.
I remember thinking,"If only I can keep this property until the market picks back up then it'll be worth it."
Nationstar gladly modified my loan that was supposed to adjust from 7% interest rate to 9%. They kept my 7% interest rate and I paid the $2,400 every month in the hopes to keep my good credit standing and also keep my property that I was still silently hoping to make money from.
This happened for two years. At that time the property that I bought for $322,000 was valued at $150,000, now my thoughts are (as you can probably imagine): "what was I thinking? Why did I even keep it?."
Anyways...
I Called Nationstar and started asking about my modification options. They offered the same thing: Keep my 7% interest rate and not let it adjust. I told them that it is no longer helpful because business was slowing down and I was beginning to miss payments. The person on the other line said to short sale the property or they can foreclose the property. Not much help.
Here are the sequence of events that followed:
- Placed the property in short sale
- Got an offer after 2 months
- Sent all the documents to the bank
- They did their due diligence to determine market value
- Waited for their answer for two weeks
- And, and only then, I get a call from the loan modification department.
This is what the representative offered me:
Pay $1800.00 (I was behind for 3 months which totals to= $7200) and they will report me as "current" to the credit bureau.
They will put the difference from the money I owe ($5400) in "arrears" and add to the current principal balance which makes the total to $ 327,400.00
Make my payment to $1400.00 ($1,000 less from my current payment) 5 year fix.
I countered with these terms:
I'll give them $1,200 not $1800 for the 3 months I'm behind.
Lower the principal to $220,000.00 - $100,000.00 less from my current note.
The monthly payment fixed to 30 years.
* They said no to all except number 1. They agreed to lower it down to $1400. *
So here I was thinking (again). Should I keep this property that I am losing money from and will continue to lose money from. Again here are the numbers.
Market Value is $150,000.00 vs $322,000.00
$2400 x 36 months that I have been paying = $86,400.00
So not only did I lose $172,000.00 with the value but another $86,400.00 the whole time I had the property; for the grand total of $258,000.00.
They now want me to pay $1400 x 60 months which again totals to $84,000.00 and cross my fingers that the Market will pick back up so I can either sell the property in 5 years or refinance or worst, do another loan modification.
Hmm. I know that since 1977, properties in Washoe County only increased in an average of 4.7%
That being said. There is no way that the price of this property will be equal to the principal anytime soon, not even in 10 years, and they won't even fix the loan for 30 years?!
For some people, having their own house is the bottom line that's why they will do a loan modification.
But most of the people that modified their loan, it eventually defaults again. So, with the numbers presented to me and me not caring about my credit situation anymore I said no way unless they lower the principal to $200,000 because of the fact that I know that I will end up paying another $84,000.00 in 5 years and I asked them to fix it for 30 years. In that scenario I could've taken it.
But they said no.
So we proceeded with the short sale. A buyer offered $150,000.00, they countered to $155,000.00 and offered the buyer that they will hold the note and give him a better interest rate than what he was being offered by another bank. Buyer said yes. DEAL! Closed in 30 days.
My questions are the ff:
I offered to keep the property, their current borrower at $200,000.00. $45,000 more than what they agreed to do on the short sale.
I have paid them all these money already. I was asking to be fixed for 30 years.
I offered a better deal to them than what they took in the short sale but why did they decide to do the short sale?
Either way, what I have experienced with this whole Loan Modification idea is the fact that I was just basically being offered a "band-aid" to a "huge wound!"
I will continue to lose money if I went with their terms. But yet surprisingly, I had to think first. The hardest part was the "human nature" being factored in by the bank: People not "wanting to lose what is ours."
Again, I believe that for some people, a modification is okay so long as it serves their purpose and forgets all the numbers because the numbers will tell you to "GET OUT!".
Just another piece of my mind that I wanted to share.
Related Posts:

